Collection & interpretation

Good decisions need clear context.

Agree what will be observed, how it will be reviewed and what the resulting information can support.

1. Agree the decision and scope

Identify the routes or places, the people who use them and the questions the project should inform. Define the attributes and expected outputs before collection.

2. Collect on the ground

Access Cart and phone-based collection capture route information and imagery. Collection coverage and attributes are specific to the agreed project.

3. Review observations

Agree the review method, responsibilities and handling of incomplete or ambiguous observations. Assisted analysis should be checked using appropriate evidence before it informs a conclusion.

4. Report with limitations

Describe coverage, collection dates, definitions and uncertainties alongside findings. Maps and datasets describe observations rather than guaranteeing route suitability for every person.

Mapping and compliance

Accessibility mapping is not automatically a legal compliance audit. Any assessment against a standard needs an explicit scope, method and qualified interpretation.

Discuss your requirements.

In their words

Experience from the people we work with.

“The final Smart Access data collection report has given us a road map moving forward to improving accessibility in our city.”

Emma MargettsProject Officer, Hobart City Council

“Allowing students and visitors to have access to the most accessible route and relevant amenities is such a great resource to have!”

Carina FraserAccessibility Manager, Waikato Institute of Technology

“The results of the audit have motivated our organisation to begin to improve all bus stops so they are accessible for all users of public transport to enjoy.”

Rachel DoelmanTransport Facilities Lead, Rotorua Lakes Council

A more accessible world starts on the ground.

What could better data change for you?

Discuss your project